Skip to content

CASE INTAKE MEMORANDUM

To: File

Re: Raymond Holloman (preliminary conviction review)


I. Purpose of Review

This memorandum summarizes the preliminary basis for reviewing the conviction of Raymond Holloman, an incarcerated Maryland man serving a life sentence for a killing he maintains he did not commit. The review focuses on whether his late diagnosis of Alcohol-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorder affects the reliability of the original case.

Mr. Holloman’s condition affects his executive function, memory, sequencing, consequence prediction, and resistance to suggestion. The diagnosis was made after he was sixty, long after the investigation and trial.

II. Established Record

The available materials establish that:

  1. Mr. Holloman was convicted in Maryland of a killing and sentenced to life imprisonment.
  2. A witness placed him at or near the scene.
  3. Mr. Holloman maintains that he did not commit the killing.
  4. His memory and sequencing impairments make it difficult for him to provide a stable, detailed account under pressure.
  5. The Patuxent clinical team identified his Alcohol-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorder after he was sixty.
  6. He also has advanced COPD.

III. Record Limitations

The materials available for this preliminary review do not establish the victim, offense date, case number, court, charge classification, police interview, precise witness testimony, corroborating evidence, defense strategy, prior appellate history, or parole terms. They also do not establish Mr. Holloman’s location at the time of the killing or identify another perpetrator.

The late diagnosis raises a serious question about how Mr. Holloman’s account was evaluated. It does not, by itself, establish that the conviction can be overturned or that a complete exoneration case has been developed.

IV. Status

The review remains preliminary. It has not identified the actual perpetrator, produced a formal finding of innocence, or secured legal relief.


‘’Companion materials: Raymond Holloman (Wrongful Conviction Journey); Raymond Holloman’s Arrest, Trial, and Wrongful Conviction; State of Maryland v. Raymond Holloman - Sentencing Order.’‘